Only on X, don’t trust fake accs
AI/Semi Supply Chains
NFA DYOR, no paid promos; may trade/hold names disc, views my own. Sharing free AI chokepoint research
Dumb Signal has archived 1,509 posts
from Serenity (@aleabitoreddit) and classified
153 as real trade calls — each priced the day it was
made and graded by direction-signed returns at 1D / 1W / 1M / 1Y, deletion-proof.
There was interesting research published called "Democratization of Retail Trading".
That did a study on 1.6 Million $RDDT WSB comments.
and found:
1. "WSB outperformed almost all investment banks at detecting top-performing stocks."
2. "Their average returns compete with the best investment banks and outperform them in certain cases."
Their conclusion?
"We conclude that WSB may indeed constitute a freely accessible, valuable source of investment advice."
I do find WSB is really early to names like $RKLB, $HOOD, and others, but often get timing extremely wrong (with options).
I think X is where all the alpha is at nowadays.
$RDDT$RKLB$HOOD
Why do I keep getting these questions!!!
$XFAB is building a Silicon Photonics foundry alternative to $TSEM and $GFS. And has Europe backing it + $NVDA evaluations.
It takes time... Like October 2026, should finish up development.
Then 2027 production scaled into 2028 (mass production), since they've been working on it since 2023.
Everyone thinks it’s a depressed automaker supplier right now. And thankfully with European names they tend to look at TTM revenue over forward growth.
So somehow it’s leading EU’s efforts to create a $TSEM silicon photonics foundry + supply chain at ~€1.1B MC?
That R&D directors from ASE cite + others as future CPO routes.
I’m might just really early to a lot of things, but of course most of the risk/reward comes from taking a little leap of faith in seeing it commercialized.
Otherwise people can take the de-risked route with Tower directly (which I also wrote a thesis on awhile back and also like).
↗ Quoting @HabsAlltheWay
$XFAB$TSEM$GFS$NVDA
Just thought this was interesting: $LPK is an unknown SpaceX supplier.
You can find it in SpaceX US import logs.
It's fun information discovery ahead of Space'x IPO this week. Though, not sure what the exact contract entails.
Disclosure: I have positions in LPK, NFA, credit to my follower Albert_TheVoid for the DM!
Especially since everyone seems to be talking about about SpaceX with Velo...
Just a fun, new direct relationship between $LPK and SpaceX if people want to do more digging.
↗ Quoting @Lg3ux
$LPK
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $LPKlong |
| | | | |
I like $SIVE
$SIVE
@Ud197601 Everyone kept calling $AXTI a scam, and my thesis BS on $RDDT.
Glad to see my thesis being validated by Reuters and Chinese/US trade negotiations lol.
$AXTI$RDDT
Oh look… a new report by Reuters shows China’s control over InP threatens the AI DC buildout.
Who could have guessed $AXTI would have been a major point of failure? https://t.co/mu9sOWGHN6 https://t.co/nm5cMhxz01
↗ Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$AXTI
这周我自己的投资组合表现令人失望。
目前今年迄今(YTD)仅上涨了 +3,612.10%。
我在获利时会分享,但我也同样会经历大幅回撤!
比如像 Foci/Shunsin $SOI, $AAOI 以及其他 CPO 相关标的。
如果 Alpha 足够强,不管宏观大环境如何,这些股票都应该继续涨才对…
所以对我来说,这也是一个学习的过程,需要不断微调我自己的思路,以及理解市场是如何对不同主题/供应链的各个环节进行定价的。
我只是边走边分享而已!
↗ Quoting @zhaoke92
$SOI$AAOI
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
-1.3% | -4.4% | -31.5% | — | -38.7% |
| $SOIlong |
| | | | |
Basically this… and it’s how cycles work.
Retail was early and completely frontran institutions on next architectural shifts.
There was close to 0 US institutional ownership on $SIVE.
And now you see active institutions like JP Morgan, Fidelity Research, and others on the cap table.
Happened last year with $NBIS.
> I called out close to <30% institutional accumulation and said they wanted more shares.
> institutions bought up majority of the float
> bunch of negative articles back then, now it’s positive and ATHs.
Two years before it was $RKLB
> Was long at $16, but institutional analysts kept giving record low PTs and told retail to sell, although it had such a high reusable rocket rate.
> retail sold, institutional ownership stocked up
> now it’s ATHs
I expect Foci (3363) to be a bottleneck for both $NVDA and $TSM optical programs and now there’s firms implying you to sell that at $2.5B valuations alongside $HIMX.
So if you see negative sellside reports or an uncanny wave of negative news, if’s a good signal they need liquidity.
Recently some smaller hedge funds have been so desperate that they’re likely even using bot farms on X that told retail to sell lol… which I’ve uncovered recently.
Regardless, it’s also why I spend a lot of time doing research on individual names so people can build their own conviction in the face of noise.
Unfortunately, it’s just a part of life how the modern liquidity cycles/transfers of US retail -> Institutions work.
They don’t work in the best interest of retail investors.
↗ Quoting @napoleon21st
$SIVE$NBIS$RKLB$NVDA$TSM$HIMX
@pilot_scheme idk, maybe $NVDA downtrend might reverse if Trump stopped threatening Iran every day?
$NVDA
@CryptoHafuya Idk $RDDT $HOOD $NFLX and your popular retail stocks are all green
$RDDT$HOOD$NFLX
Just in case you weren’t aware…
The broader index is down a significant -3-4%.
Stocks don’t move in a straight lineup unless you’re $SNDK.
And are largely affected by wider selloffs.
Curious what my follower portfolios look like you’re green this week + long only? https://t.co/XRlXdeHbm1 https://t.co/EiLrL9WX4R
↗ Quoting @cesc1994
$SNDK
Still have my $AXTI, and positions in others I haven’t mentioned as much like $ALRIB or $LPK.
Axt different reason though, one part is dilution concerns, so there’s some newer float structure risks.
Other part is not wanting to cause more export controls by talking about some things
$AXTI$ALRIB$LPK
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AXTIlong |
+3.6% | +8.0% | -32.9% | — | -4.1% |
| $ALRIBlong |
| | | | |
| $LPKlong |
| | | | |
@aphexinvests I’d expect $SOI, $XFAB, $IQE and others in the European supply chain to play follow the leader and recover as well.
Everything got sold off with photonics / power semis recently.
$SOI$XFAB$IQE
Glad optical players from $LITE to $AAOI and $SIVE are slightly recovering as they should.
The initial selloff was just stupid.
$LITE$AAOI$SIVE
@veggiepoultry That’s correct with $SIVE and Blackrock after MSCI/nasdaq. Blackrock is passive and tracks sivers based on MC.
Fidelity Research is their active investment arm, so that’s not passive.
$SIVE
@oops1GSP Bro everything has technical obstacles. I can bear post about HBM4 yields or glass substrate yields and basically everything too.
$NVDA is a $5T company, they’re not $ASTS.
I’m sure they know timelines and difficulties, so projections should be accurate.
$NVDA$ASTS
@lumingxi2025 No, $NVDA denied reports about 800v and CPO delays.
I think I’ll trust Nvidia… since they probably have an idea on their own timelines…
$NVDA
Morgan Stanley: $NVDA has denied the reports 800V DC has been pushed back.
Recent SemiAnalysis reports run contrary to our own checks at Computex.
Bro this has gotta be the dumbest CPO/800V selloff I’ve seen.
Since the selloff from their claim $MU had 0 share of Nvidia HBM4 https://t.co/YX9apQSVLT https://t.co/SZp7TBNVMU
↗ Quoting @lisasufanclub
$NVDA$MU
Yep, Blackrock has now entered $SIVE positions as passive owners following index listing.
Fidelity Research has shown up as starting direct positions of Sivers too.
Remember when JP Morgan showed up last month with small positions…
Then bought ~5.25% of the company?
This looks like US institutions validated Sivers’s position in photonics and are trying to accumulate positions.
↗ Quoting @stormdirac
$SIVE
If you want a TLDR of today:
> be $NVDA, $5T company. Force shift to 800V DC and CPO
> analyst: I don’t think u can do it in time!
> market: “I don’t trust Nvidia, time to sell everything”
> Nvidia and Lumentum executives after: Bullish on CPO, timelines accelerating.
???
$NVDA$LITE
@xnoahwang Imagine being $NVDA, the most powerful company in the world, with high visibility of their own timelines, saying there’s no delays.
Then external analysts go and say every architecture Nvidia is doing is gonna be delayed by awhile.
Yeah… I’m going long with Nvidia here.
$NVDA
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $NVDAlong |
+2.2% | +2.1% | +5.3% | — | +15.3% |
$LITE Management Speech from Mizuho Technology at today’s conference.
The company expects to start shipping CPO scale up optical products in the second half of 2027.
With formal ramp up in 2028.
No delays, as this aligns with previous timelines shared.
So today, we also got confirmation from
$NVDA SVP no delays on CPO scale out timelines H2 2026, and they’re beginning mass production.
And $LITE management also stated no delays on CPO scale up timeline.
The leading companies in Nvidia and Lumentum probably know their own timelines the better than incorrect analyst reports telling them no.
And both are incredibly bullish on TAM and opportunities.
↗ Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$LITE$NVDA
$LITE Management Speech from Mizuho Technology at today’s conference.
“For the first time, they systemically outlined the roadmap” for the next 3-5 years.
- “The company expects to start shipping scale up optical products in the second half of 2027 with formal ramp up in 2028”
- “This aligns closely to long term framework $LITE previously shared”
Today we got confirmation from
$NVDA SVP no delays on their scale out program H2 2026.
And $LITE management no delays on H2 2027 into 2028 volume ramp scale up timeline.
↗ Quoting @bigbirdflychan
$LITE$NVDA
$NVDA Networking Senior Vice President refuting recent analyst reports on delays:
- “ the most exciting stuff is co-packaged optics.”
- There is no delay in H2 CPO product delivery schedule.
- CPO switch will enter mass production and begin ramping up customer deliveries as planned in the second half of 2026
This was a media article, original interview source credit should have been credited to Tae Kim / Computex.
Something fun to note too was this quote “Gilad was VERY enthusiastic about the CPO ramp from Nvidia.”
Both near term and long term.
Yeah… I’m extremely bullish on CPO alongside Nvidia.
$NVDA
I’m just sharing what’s imminent with architectural shifts pushed by $NVDA.
Retail managed to completely frontrun institutions on multiple names, but institutions need liquidity to enter.
It’s just interesting how every major industry player confirms the same timelines, then a questionable analyst firm that said $MU had no HBM4 share could write a hit piece then be completely incorrect again.
$NVDA$MU