Only on X, donβt trust fake accs
AI/Semi Supply Chains
NFA DYOR, no paid promos; may trade/hold names disc, views my own. Sharing free AI chokepoint research
Dumb Signal has archived 1,507 posts
from Serenity (@aleabitoreddit) and classified
153 as real trade calls β each priced the day it was
made and graded by direction-signed returns at 1D / 1W / 1M / 1Y, deletion-proof.
I actually think OE Solutions ($138080.KQ
) makes the most sense as an acquisition target by a large downstream player.
Since itβs now trading at a stupid ~$215M MC for scarce EML/CW laser IP.
A Source Photonics / Suzhou Dongshan Precision type acquisition might add a lot more value to another company that wants to vertically integrate.
Given thereβs a lot of expensive R&D and capex required to scale their fabs and buildout ahead + itβs a small optical player. (Disclosure: I do own positions)
Just floating the idea out there to other companies.
β Quoting @nokorea_yesusa
$138080.KQ
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $138080.KQlong |
| | | | |
As for $LPK: Maybe $3B-$5B seems reasonable when they fully volume ramp if I had to guess.
Feels more asymmetrical to me personally since it's just a waiting game and they have the customers for glass substrates.
Small machine supplier chokepoints usually cap out from TAM though and don't go to $20B+ unless you're ASML or hold many chokepoints like KLAC.
Not many dominant "monopolies" like these out there right before volume ramp this small:
Maybe you have stuff like:
- Aixtron (MOCVD) ~$8B
- Towa (compression bonding) ~$2B
- Techwing (memory handler/cube probes) ~$1.5B
- MSScorps (CPO inspection), but pre-ramp. $850M
- Riber (quantum MBE), very pre-ramp ~$350M
Then LPK Laser for glass core substrates (about to ramp) at ~$730M, which thematically should have more premiums than memory. (eg. major advanced packaging shift, CPO adjacent, etc).
Lot of obscure chemical monopolies I know of, but those don't get as much attention cause BOM is much lower than equipment.
But for lpk you have:
eg. β80% of customers among major global players have selected LPKF equipmentβ.
70% of LIDE market share target for TGV in the glass-core ramp, should be very material. (disclosure: own, the listed names above aside from techwing/aixtron, NFI).
Just kinda the path they go if you follow $AEHR at ~$3.5B now:
- <$500m: "Oh they have no customers!"
---> (probably somewhere in the middle here).
- < $1.5B: "Maybe volume comes soon!"
- $3B+ onward: "Looks like they're starting to volume ramp.
Just a lesson for the cycle of the chokepoint machine suppliers from my personal experiences.
β Quoting @UwWtWaR
$LPK$AEHR$ASML$KLAC
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AEHRlong |
-9.7% | -16.4% | -17.5% | β | -12.1% |
| $ASMLlong |
-7.8% | -2.4% | -6.6% | β | -6.0% |
| $KLAClong |
-9.2% | +3.4% | -20.2% | β | -27.4% |
| $LPKlong |
| | | | |
Wow, 3 limit ups in a row with WUS TW. Pretty sad I didn't take larger positions.
WUS TW is 1 my 2 NAV arbitrage + independent growth trades.
If you want context: WUS TW is a ~$1.12B PCB player with AI DC growth.
Their stake in WUS Kunshan is $4.79B (11.4% of 42.04 billion)
So basically they're a $1.1B PCB player growing independently, sitting on ~$4.79B worth of another company that looks to IPOed on Hong Kong markets soon.
And a successful activist investor in Palliser (with Ajinomoto and Toto), is pressuring them to trim some holdings along with a few others.
Seems like a pretty insane disconnect, and I think there's a lot of potential here.
β Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$WUS$2802.T$5332.T
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $2802.Tlong |
| | | | |
| $5332.Tlong |
| | | | |
| $WUSlong |
| | | | |
Thatβs a misconception:
$SIVE is the laser supplier for next gen architectures, not just CPO scale up.
Pluggable, scale out CPO, scale up CPO, NPO, etc.
- Sivers and $JBL went god-mode and developed 1.6T optical transceivers with CW lasers.
Effectively designing around the EML bottlenecks, and even made things more power efficient.
From quotes from Jabil management they created a βrelatively dramatic moatβ.
So for the next gen of 1.6T pluggable transceivers, Sivers seems immediately used.
Markets missed this nuance too: after Jabilβs announcement, other pluggable players reached out, and SIVE is working with them now (prob codevelopment, qualification stage).
Thereβs not too many players that build optical transceivers that arenβt vertically integrated like Lumentum (think: Innolight/eoptolink, and maybe others).
So these are active developments, just not public material yet and could be a new press release anytime.
- for CPO scale out which happens H2 2026 onward like $POET, $SIVE is a laser supplier for those players.
- scale up CPO is h2 2027, from Ayar and Nvidiaβa NVLink CPO ecosystem and thatβs the main volume ramp across optical players.
But this is where $SIVE looks like they mog every other player from supply chain mapping.
Since theyβve likely been working + designed in with $MRVL Celestial, Lightmatter, Lightelligence and the others since they were small way back when.
On top of things like this:
For foundries like $GFS, $SIVE is the reference laser.
Not even including massive companies like O-Net building ELS with $SIVE, likely for the Asian hyperscalers supply chains.
This is why $SIVE is by far my favorite laser chokepoint long.
Feels like theyβre everywhere in new optical architectures starting beginning of 2027.
β Quoting @jinmindang
$SIVE$JBL$POET$MRVL$GFS
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $GFSlong |
+4.5% | +0.5% | -32.9% | β | -43.9% |
| $JBLlong |
+1.4% | +0.7% | -19.1% | β | -22.8% |
| $MRVLlong |
-0.9% | -9.4% | -39.2% | β | -14.9% |
| $POETlong |
-0.5% | -16.6% | -39.2% | β | -38.4% |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
I've been getting a lot of questions about OE Solutions (138080) recently.
Here's my research/thoughts so far on it:
They're a small Korean optical transceiver company, similar to $AAOI.
And they've become one the few EML players in the world (eg. $COHR, $LITE, Mitsubishi, Source, Sumitomo), with scarce 100G EML laser capacity for 800G/1.6T.
OE appears to be trying to make the full transceiver, not just the EML. They also have finished ELSFP CPO products, with UHP CW lasers, which is sampling Q3.
Likewise, OE also seems to be building out the full ELSFP, rather than selling CW laser dies, so that's more market share.
So you can think of it as Korean AAOI but EML instead of CW, and less capacity/qualifications. And playing catch-up to the rest of the world.
However in terms of timelines:
1. 23dBm cooled ELSFP samples start in Q3 2026
2. Sales base for 800G, and 2027 1.6T "full force"
3. Late H2 2027, H1 2028 onward probably their ELSFP enters the volume production.
And it seems they're working on 200G EML capability from their investor snipper 2025 OE IR snippet referenced β100GBaud EML / 200G PAM". This seems promising given their IP/demos.
ELS has just been unveiled recently, sampling starts Q3. 800G/1.6T Optical transceivers are also likely 2027.
So this is basically Korea's sovereign photonics player, playing catchup to $LITE, $AAOI, and the bigger players.
(Disclosure: I have positions in OE Solutions (138080). This is fundamental research for informational purposes, not financial advice).
As for OE solution valuations:
1. Doesn't seem like there's confirmed customers yet for these growth verticals.
2. Probably not many people understood what they're building toward yet.
3. Yields data kinda uncertain
1. Customers: We're actually in a major EML/CW laser shortage, so any independent capacity will be sought after. I personally don't think they'll have a hard time finding customers here. I would assume anything they make might get bought out and would get extra support from Korea.
2. Institutional support: Probably not much since it doesn't meet threshold for many US institution given MC size + KR listing. I also don't think many people understood what they're building yet.
3. Yields/Capacity: OE's disclosed wafer/module utilization is low (i remember was around 31% underutilized off the top of my head), so there's enough material revenue they can generate before they need to spend on capex.
I'm also not sure about EML/CW and other yields. Probably need to go ask the company.
Is this some random crap co? No. It's been doing optical transceivers stuff for more than 20Y, has R&D in the U.S. and Netherlands.
But their entire AI growth vertical seems to happen next year, and hinges mainly around capacity/yields.
And I personally think the EML/CW tech is probably worth a lot more than their current MC, if it were an acquisition target.
Especially from a larger player that wanted to vertically integrate EML for pluggables and CW lasers for CPO.
Markets are probably waiting on more certainty around qualifications after Q3 sampling or earnings projections announcements.
TLDR on thoughts:
Some of my friends discussed this last year, was probably way too early. Saw it got many comments 2 months ago, still too early.
I still think now is early, but later in Q3-Q4 might be more interesting. I personally think it's a lot higher risk than a major CPO player like $SIVE, that's embedded in Ayar, $JBL, $GFS, and many other hyperscaler suppliers. Which also has Win Semi and others de-risking volume ramp.
As OE Solutions looks like a new player trying to build out an $AAOI for the optical transceivers but sovereign EML and CW laser production for CPO products.
And there's a lot of answered questions around customers + volume ramp, which presents material risk.
But if you believe Korea can build out an 800G/1.6T transceiver EML supply chain and ELSFP with CW lasers.
With OE Solutions, it might be worth taking a look into. Still researching the company tho, just initial thoughts.
β Quoting @unintellignt
$AAOI$COHR$LITE$SIVE$JBL$GFS$138080
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
+5.8% | -14.4% | -36.7% | β | -38.7% |
| $COHRlong |
+9.2% | +4.5% | -28.7% | β | -26.1% |
| $GFSlong |
+4.5% | +0.5% | -32.9% | β | -43.9% |
| $JBLlong |
+1.4% | +0.7% | -19.1% | β | -22.8% |
| $LITElong |
+5.2% | +1.4% | -13.8% | β | +14.2% |
| $138080long |
| | | | |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
In terms of personal notes:
1. Priortech owns 21% of $CAMT, ~1.35x their MC, seems more like holding co.
2. Bit Digital people kept shouting, but NAV discount is not clean $WYFI, lot of dilution + not AI parent.
3. Wistron (3231) is the best one I've seen since $SIVE + Ayar + Wiwynn are one of my favorite trio.
~$16.2B MC, Q1 revenue up a ridiculous amount with 144% Y/Y growth.
Owns 35.46% of Wiwynn, which is ~0.66x of MC. I'd expect Wiwynn to keep on growing.
4. Sin-American Silicon 5483 does own 46.64% of GlobalWafers (6488).
MC is $3.5B, stake value is ~$7.9B, but not exactly growing too fast independently, though it's heavily trading heavily discount to NAV.
5. Iljin Holdings owns 42.99% of Iljin Electric, it's ~$0.22B MC vs. ~$1.13B NAV holding. This was transformer/cable DC related.
But again idk if I trust korean stocks for NAV unlock, probably better for activist investors.
6. Simmtech Holdings was ~$0.17B MC vs. ~$1.0B of parent, which also looks ridiculous.
So 6x+ NAV. PCB substrate related name. Also another prob don't trust korean governance type name.
I think both $ACMR and WUS have H-Share subsidiary listing soon, and those were the biggest NAV discounts with independent growth.
Then you have a highly successful activist going after WUS so I'd expect some middle ground there.
So maybe I'll put more concentration into those on top of what I already own Monday, we'll see. And Wistron was growing very fast independently.
I'm still doing research, normally this goes in shower thoughts since I haven't formally made a conclusion, but thought others might be interested.
β Quoting @pingguo2023
$CAMT$WYFI$SIVE$ACMR$BTBT$3231$5483$6488$WUS
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $ACMRlong |
-6.1% | -2.7% | -23.6% | β | -26.3% |
| $BTBTlong |
+2.8% | -11.1% | -35.5% | β | -24.9% |
| $CAMTlong |
+0.3% | -13.9% | -25.1% | β | -20.6% |
| $WYFIlong |
+16.3% | -4.3% | -34.7% | β | -53.2% |
| $3231long |
| | | | |
| $5483long |
| | | | |
| $6488long |
| | | | |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
| $WUSlong |
| | | | |
Wow, I completely missed this with $LPK meeting notes.
And I think markets did too. My biggest takeaway:
- NASDAQ listing is actively on their radar and are in discussions.
- 70% market share targeted, unholy target.
- TAM greatly exceeds former projections.
- See a 4-5 base case of players this year with orders.
- Industry is ready for high volume ramps.
I do think LPK is very undervalued based on these discussions (disclosure: own positions).
β Quoting @BrainyMarsupial
$LPK
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $LPKlong |
| | | | |
I think something to highlight also is not all my ideas are green, especially on short term timeframes!
My core three themes are Neoclouds (Energy), Memory, and Photonics.
And I'm glad I chose the literal top performers for each segment from $NBIS to $EWY leaps to $SIVE.
However, I still have pretty large losses following the false analyst report on CPO delays that $NVDA refuted:
That nuked 3 of my TW CPO longs from Foci, Msscorp, Xintec and others. (which are heavily red). Shunsin / Win Semi are holding up much better though.
Some of the other ones in Japan that I've mentioned like Towa, Harmonic Drive, NCI, etc. are performing much better following short-term volatility.
As for Korea yes I have PTSD for from Auros and now Foosung that are both both red (I didn't own 093370 though, just got PTSD watching price action).
Idk if I'll touch Korea again, just way too volatile. But I still think those will end up green eventually following Sk hynix/samsung qualifications + HVM, and the future japanese supply chain shutdown.
I also did change some of my previous long ideas like $XLU following the Iran War nuking all chances of rate cuts from 3-4 down to 0, and that didn't play out too well. Three software names I mentioned previously like $TTD, $META ended up red. $SNAP, I also changed my thesis after noticing the endless SBC accounting methods. $RDDT idea was finally in the green from $130 -> $170 after a long time.
But I think the vast majority of my ideas like $MRVL, $NBIS, $ARM, $INTC, $MU, $LITE, SK Hynix, Samsung, for larger cap.
Down to $AXTI, $LITE, $AAOI, $RPI, $IQE, and others for smaller cap positions directionally play out pretty well.
With random stuff like $SIMO, $HPS.A, $TSEM, $AEHR, $LPK, $SOI, $ALRIB, and so on all ended up turning out aight too.
The blended average is kinda overwhelmingly green since majority of my long ideas are triple digit YTD.
But I've definitely missed a few.
Also entry point is really important too... I mentioned $AAOI at $30 or $AXTI at ~$13, but not everyone has the same entry point. So if someone bought AOI at $220 and it dropped to $160, I'd feel bad.
But regardless, I'd prefer to judge how ideas play out on medium term timeframes over a few months rather than a few weeks.
β Quoting @insyyte
$NBIS$EWY$SIVE$NVDA$XLU$TTD$META$SNAP$RDDT$MRVL$ARM$INTC$MU$LITE$AXTI$AAOI$RPI$IQE$SIMO$HPS.A$TSEM$AEHR$LPK$SOI$ALRIB
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
+5.8% | -14.4% | -36.7% | β | -38.7% |
| $AEHRlong |
-1.7% | -14.3% | -29.7% | β | -13.6% |
| $ARMlong |
-7.2% | -20.9% | -39.2% | β | -34.1% |
| $AXTIlong |
+9.3% | -18.3% | -45.8% | β | -8.5% |
| $EWYlong |
-0.1% | -6.5% | -25.8% | β | -16.6% |
| $INTClong |
+5.2% | -0.8% | -29.1% | β | -10.3% |
| $LITElong |
+5.2% | +1.4% | -13.8% | β | +14.2% |
| $METAlong |
-2.1% | -7.9% | +41.8% | β | +81.7% |
| $MRVLlong |
-0.9% | -9.4% | -39.2% | β | -14.9% |
| $MUlong |
+6.8% | +7.0% | -25.1% | β | -5.7% |
| $NBISlong |
-1.1% | -10.5% | -38.0% | β | -17.7% |
| $NVDAlong |
-1.0% | -7.1% | -3.7% | β | +8.5% |
| $RDDTlong |
-2.6% | -9.7% | +3.6% | β | -18.6% |
| $SIMOlong |
+4.7% | +1.1% | -17.8% | β | -12.8% |
| $SNAPlong |
-0.6% | -6.9% | -2.8% | β | +15.9% |
| $TSEMlong |
+10.5% | -5.9% | -18.4% | β | -20.7% |
| $TTDlong |
-2.6% | -6.4% | +0.4% | β | -34.3% |
| $XLUlong |
+0.5% | +3.1% | +1.6% | β | -10.7% |
| $ALRIBlong |
| | | | |
| $HPS.Along |
| | | | |
| $IQElong |
| | | | |
| $LPKlong |
| | | | |
| $RPIlong |
| | | | |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
| $SOIlong |
| | | | |
@KristupasSimon2 Went long on Samsung through $EWY earlier on.
Still think itβs cheap given operating income forecasts.
https://t.co/l0VvosFlVE
β Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$EWY
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $EWYlong |
-0.1% | -6.5% | -25.8% | β | -16.6% |
Anyone got a list or ideas of the biggest NAV discounts. But independently has AI growth?
Stuff more extreme end like $ACMR and WUS (2316) compared to SK Square.
Have exposure to the ones above, just wanted to research more opportunities.
Seems to be getting noticed recently
$ACMR
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $ACMRlong |
-6.1% | -2.7% | -23.6% | β | -26.3% |
$ALRIB general meeting notes came out today.
-2nd ROSIE System expected to be delivered shortly to a leading quantum computing playerβ in the US.
- Theyβre also intensifying BD for their products used for BTO/STO on photonics and recorded strong interest.
Just for background, theyβre the MBE duopoly with Veeco, which got re-rated heavily recently (Disclosure own Riber), with exposure to Quantum.
Positive development overall.
β Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$ALRIB$VECO
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $VECOlong |
-2.7% | -5.3% | -34.4% | β | -35.5% |
| $ALRIBlong |
| | | | |
I agree with Palliser Capital here.
As a shareholder, itβs just so stupid how WUS (2316 TW) MC can be ~$1B MC.
While they own a 11.26% stake of WUS Kunshan, a $39.3B (Β₯282B CNY) companyβ¦
Which is worth $4.42B pre-tax. Just sell 1/4th or something?
And you get an extra ~$1.1B for PCB growth at the inflection point with AI demand.
Which is more than your current MC pre-tax, purely in cash.
And thereβs still $3.3B in assets + markets might revalue your company because of willingness to trim locked up assets.
Nobody is asking you to trim everything, but the NAV disconnect is insanity.
WUS TW management should really reconsider.
$2316
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $2316long |
| | | | |
It's really important to add the context I added later if you're reposting this multiple times, but thanks for highlighting older ideas.
With $XLU, in hindsight, was an extremely good idea for utilities. The thesis was: extreme demand from AI, capex, and rate cuts.
Then Iran War unexpectedly happened, and I made statements that it threw a knife into the thesis.
Since we went from 3-4 rate cut projected, down to 0, and even possibility of hikes.
So I cut majority concentration, but still hold a tiny bit. Utilities trade was heavily dependent on rate cuts.
It's important to stay up to date with current events, since thesis can change anytime, especially during macro black swan events.
$XLU
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $XLUshort |
-0.7% | -3.1% | -2.2% | β | +10.1% |
Donβt think thereβs any new news from $XFAB.
Their company needs to do a better job with marketing materials though.
Since nobody thinks theyβre optical ai dc or power semi adjacent exposure apparently.
However, I would have thought that since theyβre leading Europeβs silicon photonics value chain efforts with PhotonixFab.
And apparently everyone + EU are discussing sovereign AI supply chains after Fableβs export controls.
One might think theyβre a major beneficiary alongside IMEC, ligentec and others in the sovereign AI push?
Anyway, markets can always disagree or maybe they didnβt link things together.
Regardless, Iβm just curious how this plays out. (Disclosure, own positions)
β Quoting @raccoononomics
$XFAB
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $XFABlong |
| | | | |
@ChenHW8899 I would personally long LeaderDrive (688017) if I were in China!
Still really early on into robotics ramp, but I think theyβll be a clear winner given Chinaβs lead in low cost, mass production robotics.
$688017
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $688017long |
| | | | |
I mean... if i had to guess, $LPK did claim "80% of customers among major global players have selected LPKF equipment".
Kinda clear glass substrates is the next packaging shift!
From est. timelines, major players like Absolics is ramping H2 2026, Samsung Electro Mechanics 2027 + their partners.
Then there's major shifts like TSM CoPoS 2028 (seems possible $LPK upstream exposure, unconfirmed).
Just that claim of 80% is staggering and my personal expectation was markets might price it in eventually as they volume ramp (disclosure, own LPK).
Don't think there needs to be any major news, probably just getting closer to HVM timelines.
β Quoting @TesttestI23
$LPK
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $LPKlong |
| | | | |
Trendforce reports that $AMD is actively trying to secure CW laser supply with multiple major procurement orders...
Is probably just the start of the bottleneck?
There's not much independent capacity in Western supply chains left other than $SIVE or $AAOI and maybe Macom.
Especially after Lumentum/Coherent got locked up with multi-year agreements with Nvidia. (disclosure, own Sive and aaoi)
Lumentum is already CW laser constrained and is likely buying off Japanese companies like Sumitomo/Furukawa if I had to guess per ER, and those are probably running at max capacity.
From the Trendforce report, this is:
"to ensure that its future capacity will not be constrained by NVIDIA and other major Cloud Service Providers (CSPs)."
I wouldn't be surprised if other hyperscalers like Amazon, Microsoft, and others saw Nvidia / AMD signing LTAs, and are trying to secure capacity next.
A lot of it is game theory on not getting choked out by competitors, and looks like AMD is tipping the first domino after Nvidia.
But my opinion is that this just goes and show how invaluable this CW laser chokepoint is and the companies are inside it.
$AMD$SIVE$AAOI$NVDA$MTSI$LITE$COHR$AMZN$MSFT
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
-3.3% | -12.2% | -38.8% | β | -40.7% |
| $AMDlong |
+4.9% | +1.4% | -3.3% | β | +19.4% |
| $AMZNlong |
+2.9% | -1.4% | +4.1% | β | +4.9% |
| $COHRlong |
+2.8% | +3.6% | -26.7% | β | -24.0% |
| $LITElong |
-2.3% | -3.2% | -15.8% | β | +11.5% |
| $MSFTlong |
+0.1% | -3.5% | +3.9% | β | +35.6% |
| $MTSIlong |
+6.6% | +1.6% | -27.2% | β | -22.4% |
| $NVDAlong |
+3.0% | -2.8% | -0.9% | β | +11.7% |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
Iβm not sure why many folks are super bearish on my high conviction $AAOI longβ¦
Ever since $30, then on the way up to $170. (Yes I do think every bear is wrong, weβll see whoβs right).
They have scarce laser capacity that $AMD and other hyperscalers are looking for.
While the entire industry is bottlenecked by $NVDA.
Along with a US transceiver supply chain for mass production of 800g/1.6T (management - largest in America).
While demand far exceeds supply and while assembly gets outsourced to Asia.
Then theyβre quoting $471M monthly revenue in H1 entering H2 of 2027. Which is $5.6B ARR, off a $13.5B MCβ¦
While a lot of major inflection volume hits even later in 2028.
As for fluctuations, there might be active $600M ATMs that get tapped into at random times.
And random bear posts + macro from time to time that cause more volatility (eg. Analyst notes saying bear on $LITE due to false CPO delay rumors, then that brings down others in the sector).
Also weβre a year out so timelines are still a little early.
I havenβt seen such fast revenue ramp since $NBIS.
β Quoting @amiteshkumar840
$AAOI$AMD$NVDA$LITE$NBIS
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
-2.0% | -13.7% | -41.3% | β | -41.9% |
| $AMDlong |
+1.0% | +2.5% | -1.3% | β | +20.6% |
| $LITElong |
-0.6% | -5.4% | -19.3% | β | +10.8% |
| $NBISlong |
+6.0% | +3.8% | -35.2% | β | -11.0% |
| $NVDAlong |
-1.3% | -3.6% | -0.0% | β | +10.2% |
Still holding Foci/Nextronics. There was a CPO bear post from an analyst that said there would be delays (which $NVDA denied), which caused CPO related stocks to crash.
Personally think Foci will end up a bottleneck for $TSM COUPE / $NVDA and Nextronics to be a beneficiary of optical components relative to MC in $NVDA supply chains.
We'll see how this plays out.
$NVDA$TSM
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $NVDAlong |
-1.3% | -3.6% | -0.0% | β | +10.2% |
| $TSMlong |
+1.5% | +2.5% | -3.8% | β | +7.4% |
Yeah... I'm not quite sure why everyone likes just throwing personal accusations.
Like "scam" or "memestock" every time I post a thesis.
Like when I bought $AXTI (still holding shares btw):
- spent the time mapping the InP substrate supply chain
- found analyst sources around market share
- tracked high purity indium pricing on SMM
- modeled game theory around bottleneck hikes/supply shocks.
- tracked Gov publications like seizure of optical companies or export controls
Then just posted the idea for free, cause it's a hobby.
Everyone just threw out personal insults as it went up in price...
Just for Reuters to confirm it 7M later that InP substrates can halt the AI buildout.
I'm just sharing ideas out for free, could always be wrong, and they usually take some time to play out.
But would prefer instead if folks/media played devil's advocate on the thesis side like export controls or ASP pricing power...
Over just making up narratives or personal accusations like "memestock" or "foreign institutional team" when they lack the technical depth to understand AI supply chains.
β Quoting @_stockResearch
$AXTI
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AXTIlong |
-1.0% | -16.3% | -51.0% | β | -16.8% |
@schwabdeeznuts Yeah my $EWY leaps are up a similar amount, but I did 2028 dates.
Pretty insane gains on the South Korean index!
$EWY
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $EWYlong |
-0.4% | -6.7% | -20.7% | β | -11.2% |
I did say $MU looked like the next $NVDA. Now we're at a $1.23T MC.
Started talking more about Samsung Electronics/Sk Hynix back in 2025.
Put more concentration into the memory theme like $SNDK and others, Jan of this year.
And I'm glad my prediction with Micron + memory is playing out well!
Hope people had fun with $EWY longs too, those are up a lot.
β Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$MU$NVDA$SNDK$EWY
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $EWYlong |
-0.4% | -6.7% | -20.7% | β | -11.2% |
| $MUlong |
+2.2% | +3.0% | -16.4% | β | +4.7% |
| $NVDAlong |
-1.3% | -3.6% | -0.0% | β | +10.2% |
| $SNDKlong |
-1.6% | -1.4% | -29.1% | β | -12.6% |
@cchronobreakk I don't need to open any new US stock position when all my ideas from memory to photonics like $AAOI are still playing out?
$AAOI
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
-2.0% | -13.7% | -41.3% | β | -41.9% |
New reports that $AMD is scrambling for CW laser supply.
And is negotiating large-scale purchase orders for CW Lasers to ensure its production capacity is not constrained by $NVDA (Trendforce)
Obvious CW laser beneficiaries:
- $SIVE (AMD went to GFS for CPO, Sivers reference laser level)
- $AAOI (Rosenblatt analyst checks)
Lumentum/Coherent are kinda booked out way into 2028 as well.
Lumentum is especially constrained for CW capacity already from existing EML contracts (so they probably are buying from Sumitomo/Furukawa and co).
Maybe Macom and Japanese giants still have spare capacity. (disclosure, own aaoi/sivers).
I predicted this last year and said hyperscalers should go more upstream to secure capacity... at laser levels, epiwafer levels, or even inp substrate levels.
To not get bottlenecked by Nvidia.
$AMD$NVDA$SIVE$AAOI$LITE$COHR$MTSI
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
-10.8% | -10.6% | -43.0% | β | -48.2% |
| $AMDlong |
-7.3% | +0.8% | -3.3% | β | +11.8% |
| $COHRlong |
-7.5% | +2.8% | -27.7% | β | -30.5% |
| $LITElong |
-8.6% | -6.6% | -21.4% | β | +1.4% |
| $MTSIlong |
-4.3% | +3.0% | -23.8% | β | -26.0% |
| $NVDAlong |
-2.4% | -1.8% | +0.0% | β | +7.6% |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
Just as a recap, these were all my core European longs:
1. $SIVE
2. $LPK
3. $SOI
4. $RPI
5. $IQE
6. $ALRIB
7. $XFAB
Sivers: As you know by now, core laser chokepoint over next generation photonics, from 1.6T pluggables to CPO.
Embedded in many hyperscaler suppliers from Jabil to Ayar. Should go brrr 2027 but markets are forward looking, so ramps + qualifications should get priced in now.
LPK Laser - Glass core substrate "monopoly" with LIDE.
"More than 80% of major global players have selected our equipment for process validation, learning and scaling to mass production"
Soitec - Silicon photonics SoI substrate pure monopoly while coming out of legacy drag segments.
Raspberry Pi - Was my fun idea around Raspberry Pis being used for AI hardware deployments.
Previously this thing was mainly educational or hobby boards, but now used for edge/local AI. Just thought revenue increase would be extremely material and it played out well.
IQE - Critical epiwafer player for your Western photonics like Macom, Tower, Lumentum, and others.
Was kinda going under, but thought their latent capacity relative to Landmark was undervalued.
Also given how important it was, I thought that your downstream players + Govs wouldn't let it go under, so it was more of a moonshot idea earlier in the year.
Lot more derisked now, very important.
Riber - Kinda monopoly in the MBE space, exposure to Quantum / quantum dot + silicon photonics.
Found out from OSINT help from a friend latentvalue that Microsoft Quantum was buying their machines, so this was direct hyperscaler validation + kinda de-risked at current MCs.
XFab - SiC foundry backed by EU/US CHIPS Act with power semi upside. (152% Y/Y growth for their sic vertical).
Main growth was their silicon photonics foundry past 2027 that's getting evaled by nvidia. And that they're leading Europe's value chain efforts in photonics, kinda like an early tower semi.
We'll see how this plays out, thought power semi exposure + low P/B would derisk the company until they scale their photbunchonics efforts.
From my own personal thoughts:
Out of the maybe $SOI has already been re-rated the most? But I'm holding anyway.
$LPK and $ALRIB I think are still undervalued despite their monopolies.
$RPI is just kinda seeing how things go at this point, would be hilarious if they ended up like a mini nvidia for low end edge ai.
$IQE probably has a long way to go given new tower long term agreement, alongside macom. And if they convert latent capacity, I still think it has a chance of rerating like landmark.
$XFAB idk if im missing something or are markets missing something. you have nvidia as a direct eval of their silicon photonics foundry, and it's trading below replacement P/B. i think im right though.
$SIVE I see has the highest upside out of all of them given laser company ability to vertically integrate, acquire companies downstream to make their lasers more valuable, etc. Just like coherent/lumentum.
There's like 1-2 more random ones that aren't really material, but just in general.
These are the ones I've liked the most.
β Quoting @domiliebtgabi14
$SIVE$LPK$SOI$RPI$IQE$ALRIB$XFAB$NVDA$JBL$MTSI$LITE$COHR$TSEM$MSFT
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $COHRlong |
-7.5% | +2.8% | -27.7% | β | -30.5% |
| $JBLlong |
-2.6% | -2.2% | -17.2% | β | -25.6% |
| $LITElong |
-8.6% | -6.6% | -21.4% | β | +1.4% |
| $MSFTlong |
-1.5% | -8.1% | -1.0% | β | +28.5% |
| $MTSIlong |
-4.3% | +3.0% | -23.8% | β | -26.0% |
| $NVDAlong |
-2.4% | -1.8% | +0.0% | β | +7.6% |
| $TSEMlong |
-6.4% | +10.5% | -12.5% | β | -20.8% |
| $ALRIBlong |
| | | | |
| $IQElong |
| | | | |
| $LPKlong |
| | | | |
| $RPIlong |
| | | | |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
| $SOIlong |
| | | | |
| $XFABlong |
| | | | |