Only on X, don’t trust fake accs
AI/Semi Supply Chains
NFA DYOR, no paid promos; may trade/hold names disc, views my own. Sharing free AI chokepoint research
Dumb Signal has archived 999 posts
from Serenity (@aleabitoreddit) and classified
93 as real trade calls — each priced the day it was
made and graded by direction-signed returns at 1D / 1W / 1M / 1Y, deletion-proof.
H1 2027 all the 1.6T pluggable players like $JBL.
Maybe Innolight/Eoptolink and other pluggable players are added too. We'll find out soon since $SIVE said there were undisclosed pluggable players they're working with.
H2 2027 for all the main CPO scale up applications from $NVDA NVLink CPO ecosystem players like Ayar.
Markets are forward looking ~8M in advance usually.
$JBL$SIVE$NVDA
$SIVE is my favorite CPO / photonics stock after AAOI.
Partly because it's Swedish and you have entertainment from comedians over there.
Today a new non-technical hedge fund called Protean Funds (likely shorting), went on air.
To said $SIVE CPO applications are imaginary.
Right after $GFS just made $SIVE their reference laser.
(Just for some context to newer readers: Lot of people in Sweden can only look at past 12 month revenue, and don't understand concepts of forward growth)
Also because they don't understand that no CPO application has scaled up yet at all.
So Swedish hedge funds keep going short (with many of their hedge funds like Colosseum / Origo heavily underwater).
But... for the technical readers... from H2 2026 to 2028, it goes from near $0 to $91B TAM in 1 1/2 years. (we're entering H2 now).
Overall TAM hits $141B (which is also 10x+ or so in 1 1/2 years)... and $SIVE has scaled into pluggable market with $JBL + other unnamed pluggable players with that too.
Probably not going to end well for the local Swedish firms, shorting right before the largest inflection points ever hits for $SIVE.
Just a matter of time before volume ramps.
$SIVE$GFS$AAOI$JBL
@dong7da7 I used to draw silly things on charts like Pokemon on charts to joke about how people do TAs.
Because most of the time, technical analysis doesn’t actually mean anything, since fundamentals are the most important!
That Charizard photo was my $GOOGL callout back at $156.
$GOOGL
$AAOI is my current favorite US long.
I personally cost average recently whenever it dips to $150, or even $170.
$JBL should preform really well once they’re 1.6T LRO goes mass production with $SIVE h1 2027 imo. Also talked about $RDDT today.
$MRVL if you think it hits $1T and follow along Jensen.
$AAOI$JBL$SIVE$RDDT$MRVL
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
+11.1% | -4.5% | -31.7% | — | -46.7% |
| $JBLlong |
+3.0% | +8.9% | -3.4% | — | -10.8% |
| $MRVLlong |
+9.6% | +6.2% | -6.9% | — | -28.8% |
| $RDDTlong |
-1.3% | -6.5% | +12.2% | — | -18.9% |
| $SIVElong |
| | | | |
@Jornka329996 Are you high, I posted about $XFAB this week.
Their silicon photonics platform with $NVDA and $NOK scales h2 2027 / 2028.
I think it’s a heavily derisked precommercial long that looks like the next $TSEM. With upside from SiC/GaN.
Just needs time.
$XFAB$NVDA$NOK$TSEM
@Frenchie_ They keep fighting with me with everything from $SOI, $RPI, and $SIVE.
Then get embarrassed over and over. Idk if they’re going to learn
$SOI$RPI$SIVE
$RPI: $283 -> $983, up 247% from my thesis post.
Quote: Strong AI-related demand was expected to result in core profit "significantly ahead" of market expectations.
Turns out European Media’s favorite “memestock” with “no fundamentals” back in Feb.
Was actually was backed by revenue growth from AI?
$RPI
@jukan05 It’s interesting mainland China finds the information synthesis compelling. Just wanted to publish some free ideas but didn’t expect the volatility
Unfortunately I can’t buy the asset in the US… lot of the Chinese humanoid component players are absolutely dominating
$688017
(disclosure: I don't own shares of Leaderdrive, I'm just publishing my research for free).
For LeaderDrive, it's a material percentage of every humanoid that gets developed.
AGIBot and Unitree has only started to scale up recently, and figures has just reached 10k units shipped (agibot). So P/E valuations would be very high currently since humanoids are not in mass production.
Markets are forward looking though. If you think Tesla Optimus, Unitree can mass produce tens of millions or hundreds of millions of robots in the next few years.
With trillions of dollars flowing into the humanoid industry.
If you have 5% market capture of robot that gets made for the humanoid rollout. That's would command a much higher valuation than Leaderdrive's current marketcap.
So LeaderDrive was the robotics player I've identified with the most exposure so far.
$688017
@solsniper330 绿的谐波(688017)打入了所有主流人形机器人开发商的供应链,所以我非常看好这家公司,哪怕我并没有它的持仓
$688017
专门写给我的中文读者:
绿的谐波(LeaderDrive,688017,577.3亿人民币)是我在布局人形机器人赛道时最青睐的中国上市标的。
他们的业务涵盖:
谐波减速器(据称占有超过60%的国内市场份额,以及1800多家全球客户)
人形机器人旋转关节减速器
直线执行器
电机/关节,以及许多其他核心零部件。
并且他们正在进军行星滚柱丝杠(planetary roller screws)领域。
目前占据着绝对的主导地位:超过60%的国内市场份额以及1800多家全球客户。
主要客户包括优傲机器人(Universal Robots)、优必选(UBTech)、智元机器人(Agibot),而特斯拉(Tesla)、Figure 以及绝大多数其他人形机器人研发商都很可能是他们的潜在客户。
如果你看一下这些零部件的 BOM(物料清单),粗略估计它们占到了每台研发出的人形机器人的 4-15%,随着他们进军更多细分领域,这个比例可能还会更高。
我认为没有人能对这类公司进行精确的财务建模,其前景更多取决于未来几年内会有多少人形机器人实现量产。
这其实是对一家能够在每台生产出的人形机器人中占据可观份额的公司,进行的一种方向性做多(directional long)。
在可扩展的规模化量产方面,中国显然是该领域的领导者,许多西方玩家无法将成本降到绿的谐波那样的水平。
随着我们向实体人工智能(physical AI)的规模化迈进,我极其看好机器人这个赛道。
$688017
$AAOI is one of the names I keep averaging up on since $28.
Just from random shower thoughts… I feel like it’s just imminent to double or triple if they execute?
There’s just too much demand for 800g/1.6T optical transceivers…
Then this company is targeting the largest capacity in the US, with extreme vertical integration.
I think something to keep in mind is sovereign DCs / T2 AI DCs which increase the demand for 800g as hyperscalers upgrade to 1.6T.
So demand for 800g can actually keep increasing…
Then there’s the analyst rumors of $AAOI conversations with $AMD / $NVDA. Which is kinda expected given everyone is getting their capacity allocated way into 2028.
Nvidia always starts first and causes bottlenecks for everyone else as seen with EML, so not surprising if another hyperscaler learned their lesson this time?
Also, everyone seems to be modeling lower ASP at scale. But if this ends up a major bottleneck H1 next year as expected…
Could see unexpected price hikes + margin expansion across the board from $AAOI, $LITE, and others not really modeled in.
$AAOI$AMD$NVDA$LITE
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $AAOIlong |
-12.8% | -14.8% | -40.4% | — | -53.5% |
| $AMDlong |
-10.9% | -6.6% | -1.0% | — | -9.0% |
| $LITElong |
-8.6% | -5.9% | -22.9% | — | -24.5% |
| $NVDAlong |
-6.2% | -6.3% | -10.9% | — | -8.2% |
$RDDT was driving me insane.
> massive earnings beat
> just printing FCF since they’re too profitable
> 69% Y/Y revenue growth.
> biggest moat against AI vibe coding from network effect
> 91.5% gross margin.
Was just flat for months. Glad to see it getting more attention. https://t.co/umUxYdXkz7 https://t.co/tuVMZIwgAH
↗ Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$RDDT
Found this news funny about a new Swedish Hedge fund:
Origo’s fund has lost substantial money shorting $SIVE.
“The loss is one of the biggest this year"
Many of these Swedish hedge funds are now heavily underwater.
Just as an accidental byproduct of $SIVE being a core part of the CPO supercycle.
Starting to make more sense why there’s a lot of false news being published.
Especially if they’re facing infinite losses?
↗ Quoting @aleabitoreddit
$SIVE
This timeline keeps getting more and more unreal…
$NVDA Jensen Huang to meet Faker (League of Legends)
I did talk with Jensen few years back about PUBG and GPU shortages for mining.
And he was enthusiastic about ideas for cross-platform gaming + getting enough allocation to gamers.
Fast forward to now, feels like Nvidia kinda ignored gamers… for AI, which is understandable.
So this is a nice symbolic message for a return to Nvidia’s roots.
$NVDA
It’s a bit hard for major companies to go about acquiring CHIPS act funded companies like $SIVE on a whim. Or $IQE with gov ties.
Lot of the venture arms just miss it sometimes too.
$MTSI took a stake in IQE so that’s another path. Maybe $GFS or $JBL takes a stake in $SIVE following June’s vote.
$SIVE$IQE$MTSI$GFS$JBL
Up to Win Semi and other foundries. Win Semi just did a private placement to scale up capacity, pretty confident they can scale up significant volume for $SIVE. Nobody knows the exact figures for late 2027 or 2028, but confident in one of the world’s leading foundries.
But again, even if everyone in the industry mass produces cw, won’t be enough for overall demand.
Which is why it’s a bottleneck.
$SIVE
I’m confident in my $SIVE thesis playing out and am not selling a single share.
I tried to tell Swedish locals back at 6 SEK how compelling their frontier company was but they all transferred their shares to US retail since they couldn’t understand the concept of forward growth.
If US retail want to follow disinformation about a wireless director selling shares like any normal employee would, 3 months ago, back to institutions.
At the inflection of CPO/pluggable ramp… They’re free to as well.
I’m just trying to combat disinformation by sharing all the nuances.
$SIVE
I’ve repeated this for every single stock, but insider selling means literally nothing.
A managing director of wireless transferring ownership over to US investors doesn’t change any fundamentals about the business.
CEO of $NVDA and $MU sell shares all the time but nobody bats an eye for a reason
$NVDA$MU
@SidkMena It’s not a monopoly. Just technical dominance over ASIC/Merchant CPO route architectures .
And wouldn’t be surprised if other pluggable players created novel 1.6T architectures using $SIVE too.
$SIVE
$SIVE looks like both a chokepoint and a bottleneck for CPO next year.
Keep seeing information published from nontechnical people who miss any nuances.
Here’s the reason why:
1. CW lasers are bottlenecked signaled by $LITE earnings.
Laser fabs are heavily allocated to EML likely from former $NVDA contracts.
-> Sumitomo/Furukawa = bottleneck
-> Win Semi = bottleneck
$SIVE does fab-lite, so are they a bottleneck?
Yes, $SIVE sits in the laser bottleneck since control output supply of CW lasers from Win Semi and other fabs from allocation way early on (CEO stated they working with more capacity from other players as well).
Perfect example is Kioxia/Sandisk. $SNDK controls NAND output, so they’re a bottleneck because they control final pricing.
Demand exceeding supply from Ayar, Jabil, other pluggable vendors + Nvidia NVLink CPO ecosystem… final laser supply owned by $SIVE makes Sivers a bottleneck.
$SIVE is also likely primary/sole source for Jabil, Gen-1 Ayar, $MRVL Celestial, and other hyperscaler asic/merchant CPO routes. So no way to get around it (can’t hot-swap single channel cw lasers with Sivers)
2. $SIVE is a chokepoint over CPO.
$NVDA use $COHR, $LITE (which likely sources external cw capacity from Japanese competitors)
$AVGO is likely vertically integrated as well.
However: the entire ecosystem around it from ASIC programs (Marvell, AlChip, etc) and merchant programs (Ayar, Lightmatter, Lightelligence)
Are all likely designed around $SIVE.
Ayar for example, likely tried to multi-source with $MTSI / $LITE back in 2022 but their lasers probably couldn’t match the level of Sivers specification with arrays (removed Lumentum / Macom from their supply chain site recently)
If there’s no alternative at least for the initial generations (obviously they’re working to multi-source). That makes $SIVE a structural chokepoint to go through for lasers.
Even if you look at the 1.6T LRO $JBL designed, they achieved a “drastic moat” with performance built around $SIVE likely sole source.
$SIVE is also the foundry level reference laser design for $GFS, which your hyperscalers use like $AMD (likely using Sivers + maybe Ayar for gen1):
If every major player, who hasn’t achieved vertical integration (Nvidia/Broadcom) is using Sivers for CPO…
That makes them a chokepoint.
Just look at the entire CPO $NVDA NVLink ecosystem partners: every single one are all likely using Sivers. And they all use $GFS as well (where Sivers is default reference).
So $SIVE is both a chokepoint and bottleneck when CPO really scales up H2 2027, over one of the biggest architectural shifts of all time (near $0 -> $81B or $91B TAM in the next 1 1/2 years from GS research note)
This is why I say $SIVE looks like it could be the next $75B $LITE over the next couple years.
All of this should play out next year.
And it’s still trading less than a company with $50M in purchase agreements that buys Sivers lasers to repackage them.
$SIVE$LITE$NVDA$SNDK$MRVL$COHR$AVGO$MTSI$JBL$GFS$AMD
@_king142 $SIVE was probably the most recent visible laser chokepoint that’s still being rerated since seem to be in every $NVDA NVLink CPO ecosystem partner + merchant/asic cpo supply chains.
Maybe passive optical components supply chains in CPO next.
$SIVE$NVDA
Too early of you’re referring to CPO usage. H2 2028 is probably timeline for commercialization. AMS / Mediatek / others are all working in this area but still in development.
So maybe revisit H1 entering H2 2027.
Lot of research reports state very low readiness, but I keep seeing a lot of media hyping this tech.
$AMS
Yeah… I think all your upstream semi supply chain companies are going much higher.
Goldman now expects a combined $5.3 trillion of capex spending for the four largest hyperscalers $GOOGL / $META / MSFT / $AMZN from 2025 to 2030.
Revised up from $4.5T from Q1 earnings.
“Aggregate capex est. $7.6 trillion between 2026 and 2031.”
And it flows upward to these tiny chokepoints like $SIVE for CPO lasers/ $SOI for Silicon Photonics substrates. Leaderdrive/Harmonic for Humanoids components.
And so on…
Ai names don’t move in a straight line up,
but is just the beginning of the next Industrial Revolution as we move from R&D/compute buildout into commercialization from Agents -> Physical AI -> discovery.
$GOOGL$META$MSFT$AMZN$SIVE$SOI
@RockyKh49376975 I ended up buying $IBIT and $ETHA today at $62K / $1.75K.
Just swing trading those, not long term holding.
But prices dropping hurts $HOOD / $COIN and the others.
$IBIT$ETHA$HOOD$COIN
| return | 1D | 1W | 1M | 1Y | now |
| $COINlong |
+0.6% | -5.7% | +1.4% | — | -10.4% |
| $ETHAlong |
-1.4% | -9.6% | -5.3% | — | +3.6% |
| $HOODlong |
+6.6% | +4.2% | +36.1% | — | +4.5% |
| $IBITlong |
-2.6% | -5.2% | -5.8% | — | -3.7% |